सन् २००१ या न्ह्यथ्याः ईनिसें, विकिपिडिया तीब्र रुपं ब्वलना: इन्तरनेटया त:धंगु रिफरेन्स स्रोत जूगु दु | विकिपिडियाया च्वसू सितिकं (ध्यबापुलेम्वायेक) स्वये दु, व च्वसूत [मंका कथं] हलिंया स्वयमसेवक पिस॑ च्वयादिइ | थ्व वेबय् छगू हे विकिख: अर्थात सुं न मनुखं (सहभागि॑) गुगून॑ अन्तरजालया माध्यम॑ सम्पादन, द्व॑गु खँ भि॑केगु, जानकारी वा सुच॑ तयेगु ज्या edit this page लिन्क तिया याना दिइ फइ (अपवादय् छुं सुरक्षित पौत लाइ)।
विकिपिडिया नन-प्रोफिट (लवः मथइगु) संस्था विकिमिडिया गुथियागु छगु दर्ता यानात:गु ट्रेडमार्क ख: | थ्व गुथि॑ विकिपरियोजनाछगु चाकः (परिवार) हे दयेका त:गु दु । विकिपिडियाय् व थुकिया जःखः परियोजनाय् छित: सकृय जुया लेख (च्वसू) सम्पादन यायेत, छिगु ज्ञां मंका: कथ॑ इनेत लसकुस दु |
लेखय् दुगु लिन्कतय्सं छित: स्वापू दुगु लेखय् यंकी, अज्या:गु लिन्कं सम्बन्धित विषयलय् अप्व: जानकारी बीत ग्वाहालि याइ | विकिपिडियायागु सम्पादन नियम पालना याना जानकारी, क्रस-रिफरेन्स, साइट तय्स॑ तनेत छित: लसकुस दु| छिं मसिइसक॑ विकिपिडियायागु पौ स्यंकुसां छि ग्याना दिइ म्वा: छाय् धा:सा विकिपिडियायागु स्वयमसेवक तय्सं अन्यागु पौत भि॑का: छितः ग्वाहालि यानादिइ | हाकनं मिडियाविकि सफ्टवेयर थज्या:गु कथ॑ दयेका त:गु दु कि अज्याःगु स्येंगु पौयात न्हापायागु हे भिंगु पौस अःपुक हे हिलेफइ |
विकिपिडिया छगू न्ह्यागु इलय् नं परिमार्जन जुया च्वनीगु ज्याखं जूगुलिं छापय् जुया वइगु स्रोत स्वया थ्व भतीचा पा: | अप्व याना थुकिइ पूलांगु लेखत (च्वसूत) थुइके अपुक व पूवंगु जुइ धा:सा न्हूगु लेखय् म्वा:मदुगु, ज्या मदुगु (मवःगु), हुल्याहा पहःयागु नं जुइ फइ |छ्यलामित अथे जुइगुलिं ख:गु जानकारी कायेत व हुया मछ्व:गु म्वा:मदुगु ज्याखं पनेत सजग जुइ मा: | (पूवंगु जानकारीयागु नि॑ति॑ स्वयादिसं विकिपिडिया:विकिपिडियानाप मालेज्या)| अथेजूसां छापेयायेगु स्रोतस्वया॑ थ्व स्रोत अप्व अप-टु-डेट जुइ छाये धा:सां थुकिइ लेख मिनेट व घौयागु (घौपलखया) दुने हे परिमार्जित जुइ गन छापेयायेगु स्रोत (हलिमसफु) तयेगु न्हूगु संस्करण वयेत ला वा द॑ पियाच्वने मालिइ |
छित: विकिपिडिया छु ख (व छु मखु) व विकिपिडियानाप मालेज्या, छक्वः ब्वनादिइत इनाप दु | व पौ त ब्वनादिइ धुंका छित विकिपिडियाय् छु याना छ्यलीगु, गुलि विश्वास यायेगु व छिं याना दिइ फइगु ज्याया बारे छित ज्ञा॑ दइ | मू विषयलय् अप्व जानकारी क्वय् बिया त:गु कथ॑ दु |
स्वया दिसँ: विकिपिडिया:लसकुस, न्हूम्ह मनू।
ग्वाहालि, न्ह्यस: व थाय्बाय्यागु नि॑ति॑, स्वयादिसं ग्वाहालि:धल:पौ
थाय्बाय्या बुखंया नि॑ति॑, स्वयादिसं विकिपिडिया:बुखं
विकिपिडियायागु दक्कले भिंगु छ्यलेज्या यायेगुEdit
थन मनू त ज्ञां कायेत व हिलेत थ्यनी । अज्या:गु ज्याखंय् यक्वं हिलेज्या जुइ । थज्यागु हिलेज्या छिं हिलेज्याय् स्वयादी फइ। न्हूगु च्वसू मुंकेज्या व क्यने (ब्वये) ज्या जुया हे च्वनी | थींथीं कथंया मनूतय्सं (सहभागिपिसं) विकिपिडियाय् लेख (च्वसू) च्वयादिइ।
विकिपिडियाय् यक्कों परियोजनात न्ह्यानाच्वंगु दु । ग्वाहालिमिपिनिगु आशा धयागु सकलसित ज्यावःगु व तथ्यगत सुचंत कालबिल यायेगु खः, व परियोजनां तप्यंक ग्वाहालि यायेत कुतः याइ । अप्वःयानां च्वसूत सुयागुं छ्याता वा घ्वाना कथं न्ह्याइ, तर यक्को सहभागिपिनिगु ग्वाहालिं लिपाथ्यंका: थुकिं च्वसुया रुप काइ ।
यदी छिं मालाच्वनदियागु छुं लुयावयाच्वंगु मदुसा, स्वयादिसं गनन्यनेगु विभागया धलः गन स्वयंमसेबिपिसं लिसः बिइ, छिं छुंनं कथंया न्ह्यसः थन तयादिइ फइ ।
छिं मलादियागु विषयस च्वसू विकिपिडियाय् मदुगु तायेकादियागु जुलसा, छिं आह्वान च्वसू च्वसू थम्हं हे नं च्वया दिइ फइ (वा छिं उगु विषयस अगुसन्धान नापं यानादी फइ व थम्हं हे च्वसू च्वयादी फइ) ।
छिं स्वयदी फइ उगुंथुगुं च्वसू ।
छिं विकिपिडिया मेमेगु भासं नं ब्वना दी फइ । विकिपिडियाय् २००गु सिबें अप्वः थीथी भाय् (स्वयादिसं मेगु भाय् संस्करणत, थुकी Simple English संस्करण नं दुथ्या व सम्वन्धित परियोजनाय् दुथ्या:गु खंग्वः धुकू, धपूत, सफू, व वैज्ञानिक लिधंसा व सुचं सेवा (स्वयादिसं तःकेहें परियोजनात) । थपिं फुक्कं सुचंत समायोजन व व्यबस्थापन बिस्कंया हे समुदय नं याइ, व निरन्तर कथं सुचं व च्वसू तयेगु प्रचार यानाच्वनी गुपिं मेमेगु श्रोतय् सरलकथं माले फइमखु ।
विकिपिडियाय् प्रारम्भिक दुवालाEdit
विकिपिडियाय् दुथ्या:गु फुक्कं च्वसूत स्वापूदुगु, वा छगुलिं मेगु नाप लिधंसाय् दइ । गन नं छिं बिस्कं कथंया खंग्वःत दसु कथंथ्व खंका दिल धा:सा, थुकिया अर्थ थ्व खंग्वः नाप स्वापू दुगु च्वसू वा विकिपिडियाया पेज दु गन तंसा व विस्तृत सुचं दु, गुगु छिं न्ह्यबले नं स्वयादी फइ । छिं उगु खंग्वःस माउस (mouse) अं तियादिसं छित सम्वन्धित स्वापू दुगु च्वसू वा विकिपिडियाया पेजय् थ्यंकाबी । छि न्ह्याबलें तंसा सुचं व जानकारिया निंतिं माउस छक्वः तिइगुलिं तापनाच्वनी । Wikipedia articles are all linked, or cross-referenced. Wherever you see highlighted text like this, it means there is a link to some relevant article or Wikipedia page with further in-depth information elsewhere if you need it. Holding your mouse over the link will often show you where a link will take you. You are always one click away from more information on any point that has a link attached.
मेमेगु स्वापूत गुपिं अप्वयाना च्वसूया दक्कले लिपांगु ब्वय् दइ वा च्वसू नाप स्वा:गु मेगु यइपुगु च्वसूत, स्वापू दुगु मेमेगु वेभ पेज (web pages) लिधंसा सामाग्रि संयोजित ज्ञांया ताजि, गुगु छिं तंसा सुचंया निंतिं हनाबना वा कथंहंक मालेगु ज्या यायेफइ । There are other links towards the ends of most articles, for other articles of interest, relevant external web sites and pages, reference material, and organized categories of knowledge which you can search and traverse in a loose hierarchy for more information.
गुलिंगुलिं च्वसूतयेगु स्वापू खंग्वः धुकूया परिभाषा, सःहनातःगु सफू, धापूत व वहे च्वसू मेमेगु भासं ल्ह्ययातःगु लुइके फइ । Some articles may also have links to dictionary definitions, audio-book readings, quotations, or the same article in other languages.
छिं थजा:गु स्वापूत त्वःफिनाच्वंगु खंकादियागु जुलसा तनादिइ फइ व थ्व छगू छिगु योगदन जुइ । You can add further links if a relevant link is missing, and this is one way to contribute.
विकिपिडिया छ्यला, अनुसन्धानया ज्याभः कथंEdit
Using Wikipedia as a research toolEdit
झीसं स्यू, विकि या च्वसूत गुबलें हे पूवनी मखु । थुपिं च्वसूत निरन्तर कथं सम्पादन व भिंकेगु ज्या जुया हे च्वनी, थुकिया परिणाम बांलागु व गुणस्तर अले पाय्छिगु सुचंया कालबिल जुइ । As a wiki, articles are never complete. They are continually edited and improved over time, and in general this results in an upward trend of quality, and a growing consensus over a fair and balanced representation of information.
छ्यलमिपिसं ध्यान बिइमाःगु खं छु धाःसा, फुक्कं प्रारम्भिक च्वसू वा सुचंत तथ्यगत (encyclopedic) जुइमखु । अप्वयाना च्वसूत यक्क्वं कथं सहलह, विवाद व विचारया चरण क्वचाय् धुंकातिनि छगु कथंया सहमतिय अवस्थाय् थ्यनी । गुलिंगुलि विवाद ज्यंकेत ताःई नं काइ व लिपा वया व्यबस्थित कथं सहमत जुइ । Users should be aware that not all articles are of encyclopedic quality from the start. Indeed, many articles commence their lives as partisan, and it is after a long process of discussion, debate and argument, that they gradually take on a consensus form. Others may for a while become caught up in a heavily unbalanced viewpoint which can take some time - months perhaps - to extricate themselves and regain a better balanced consensus.
गुबलें गुबलें विकिपिडियाया आन्तरिक समझदरिया प्रक्रिया सिबें बिस्कं कथंया विवादत खनेदइ, थुजागु परिस्थिति धयागु सम्पादकतयेगु बिचाः व प्रक्रियाय् मत विभाजन जुइगु खः, थुगु अवस्थाय् अझ अप्वः ग्यसुग्यंपिं सम्पदक व भचा अप्वः ईया आवश्यक जुइ ।
In part, this is because Wikipedia operates an internal resolution process when editors cannot agree on content and approach, and such issues take time to come to the attention of more experienced editors.
सधारणतया विकिपिडियाय् न्ह्यब्वइगु च्वसूत व्यबस्थित, ततस्थ व सोचमूलक जुइ गुकी लुमंकेबहःगु व छ्याताकाये बहगु ज्ञां कायेबहःगु जुइ । अप्वः धयाथें च्वसूत ईलं घ्वाना थुगु स्तरय् तक थ्यंकी अझ गुलिला थ्यनेधुन्कुगु दु । छ्यलामि पिसं थःथःगु कथं थःथःगु ईलय् भिन्के ज्या याइगु जूगुलिं थजागु प्रक्रिया पूवनेत लां ला व दं द मालीगु स्वभाविक खः । गुलिं गुलिं च्वसूत दुने विचारधारा व छ्याता त दुथ्यानाच्वंगुलिं आःतक नं सर्वमान्य मजूनि व समाधान जुइमफुनि । गुलिं गुलिं यात न्हूगु हे ब्व दयेका छ्यलाबुलाय् हयेगु याइ । गुलिं च्वसूयात यक्वं बहस ब्याका नं मज्यनिगु जुलकि विकिपिडियां लिकायेगु नं याइ । The ideal Wikipedia article is balanced, neutral and encyclopedic, containing notable verifiable knowledge. An increasing number of articles reach this standard over time, and many already have. However this is a process and can take months or years to be achieved, as each user adds their contribution in turn. Some articles contain statements and claims which have not yet been fully cited. Others will later have entire new sections added. Some information will be considered by later contributors to be insufficiently founded, and may be removed or expounded.
While the overall trend is generally upward, it is important to use Wikipedia carefully if it is intended to be used as a research source, since individual articles will, by their nature, vary in standard and maturity. There are guidelines and information pages designed to help users and researchers do this effectively, and an article that summarizes third party studies and assessments of the reliability of Wikipedia.
Summary of strengths, weaknesses and article quality in WikipediaEdit
Wikipedia's greatest strengths, weaknesses and differences arise because it is open to anyone, has a large contributor base, and articles are written by consensus according to editorial guidelines and policies.
- Wikipedia is open to a large contributor base - so it is less susceptible to retaining bias, is very hard for any group to censor, and is far more responsive to new information, especially information not widely known in the West, and it is more easily vandalized or susceptible to unchecked information later needing removal.
- Wikipedia is written by consensus - so eventually for most articles, all notable views become fairly described and a very neutral stance can be achieved even on emotive subjects, and the reaching of consensus takes considerably longer than a simple drafting, and is occasionally made harder by extreme-viewpoint contributors. (Articles also tend to be more fluid or changeable for a long time compared to other reference sources until they find their "neutral approach" that all sides can agree on.)
Key strengths: (Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is so great)
- Having a very large number of active writers and editors in many languages, Wikipedia often provides access and breadth on subject matter that is otherwise inaccessible or little documented.
- Wikipedia often produces excellent encyclopedic articles and resources covering newsworthy events within hours or days of their occurrence.
- Wikipedia is one of few sites even attempting neutral, objective, encyclopedic coverage of popular culture.
- Regional and cultural bias found in many publications is significantly reduced on Wikipedia.
- In comparison with most web-based resources, Wikipedia's open approach tremendously increases the chances that any particular factual error or misleading statement will be relatively promptly corrected.
- There is no one central point where censorship can be imposed, and therefore censorship by any given group, restriction to "officially reported" sources, or "pushing" of any particular viewpoint, whether official or unofficial, is difficult to achieve and almost always fails after a time.
- In contrast with many web resources, information added to Wikipedia never "vanishes", and is never "lost" or deleted.
Key weaknesses: (Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is not so great)
- Wikipedia's radical openness means that any given article may be, at any given moment, in a bad state, such as in the middle of a large edit, a controversial rewrite, or recently vandalized.
- Wikipedia operates a full editorial dispute resolution process, that allows time for discussion and resolution in depth, but also permits months-long disagreements before poor quality or biased edits will be removed forcibly.
- While blatant vandalism is usually easily spotted and rapidly corrected, Wikipedia is more subject to subtle vandalism and viewpoint promotion than a typical reference work.
- There is no systematic process to make sure that "obviously important" topics are written about, so Wikipedia may contain unexpected oversights and omissions.
- Articles may be incomplete in ways that would be less usual in a more tightly controlled reference work, for example some aspects may be well covered but others briefly or not at all.
- Wikipedia articles may have a tendency to reflect the point-of-view (POV) of the author and by implication the author's cultural and socio-economic background. While most articles may be altered by anyone, in practice editing will be performed by a certain demographic (younger rather than older, male rather than female, rich enough to afford a computer rather than poor, Christian or Jewish rather than Muslim or Bantu etc.) and will thus necessarily reflect a certain degree of implicit bias.
- Many contributors do not yet comply fully with key policies, or may add information without citable sources.
- While Wikipedia articles generally attain a good standard after editing, it is important to note that fledgling, or less well monitored, articles may be susceptible to vandalism and insertion of false information, although this usually ceases to be as significant a problem as articles mature. Inappropriate edits are often noticed and corrected within a relatively short time on most articles
- Studies suggest that Wikipedia is broadly as reliable as Encyclopedia Brittanica, with similar error rates on established articles for both major and minor omissions and errors. There is a tentative consensus, backed by a gradual increase in academic citation as a source, that it provides a good starting point for research, and that articles in general have proven to be reasonably sound. That said, articles and subject areas sometimes suffer from significant omissions, and whilst misinformation and vandalism are usually corrected quickly, this does not always happen. (See for example this incident in which a person inserted a fake biography linking a prominent journalist to the Kennedy assassinations and Soviet Russia as a joke on a co-worker which went undetected for 4 months, saying afterwards he "didn’t know [Wikipedia] was used as a serious reference tool.") Therefore, a common conclusion is that it is a valuable resource and provides a good reference point on its subjects, but like any online source, unfamiliar information should be checked before relying upon it.
- A 2005 editorial by a BBC technology writer comments that these debates are probably symptomatic of new cultural learnings which are happening across all sources of information (including search engines and the media), namely "a better sense of how to evaluate information sources." 
How Wikipedia differs from a paper encyclopediaEdit
- Main article: Wikipedia is not paper
Reports have sometimes cited the Wikipedia disclaimers to support claims that the Wikipedia is unreliable. A selection of similar disclaimers from places which are often regarded as reliable (including sources such as Encyclopædia Britannica, Associated Press, and the Oxford English Dictionary) can be read and compared at Non-Wikipedia disclaimers.
Wikipedia content advisories can also be found here.
Contributing to WikipediaEdit
Anyone can contribute to Wikipedia by clicking on the Edit this page tab in an article. Before beginning to contribute however, you should check out some handy helping tools such as the tutorial and the policies and guidelines, as well as our welcome page.
It is important to realize that in contributing to Wikipedia, users are expected to be civil and neutral, respecting all points of view, and only add verifiable and factual information rather than personal views and opinions. "The five pillars of Wikipedia" cover this approach and are recommended reading before editing.
सुनां च्वइ विकिपिडियाEdit
Who writes Wikipedia?Edit
"मू पौ:विकिपिडिया:सुनां च्वइ विकिपिडिया"
- Main article: Wikipedia:Who writes Wikipedia
द्वलं द्वःया ल्याखं विकिपिडियाय् नियमित कथं च्वइपिं व सम्पादन याइपिं दु, गुकिइ सधारण ब्वमि निसें प्राज्ञ तकं दु । न्ह्याम्ह नं छ्यलामि वा ब्वनामि थुगु विकिया पेजय् थ्यनीपिसं सम्पादन याये फइगु व न्हूगु खं तने फइगुलिं विषय वस्तुया व्यापकता अप्वया वनाच्वंगु खः । There are tens of thousands of regular editors - everyone from expert scholars to casual readers. Anyone who visits the site can edit it, and this fact has encouraged contribution of a tremendous amount of content. There are mechanisms that help community members watch for bad edits, a few hundred administrators with special powers to enforce good behavior, and a judicial committee which considers the few situations remaining unresolved, and decides on withdrawal or restriction of editing privileges or other punishments when needed, after all other consensus remedies have been tried. The site is owned by the Wikimedia Foundation, which is largely uninvolved in daily operation and writing.
Editing Wikipedia pagesEdit
- Main article, including list of common mark-up shortcuts: Wikipedia:How to edit a page
Wikipedia uses a simple yet powerful page layout to allow editors to concentrate on adding material rather than page design. These include automatic sections and subsections, automatic references and cross-references, image and table inclusion, indented and listed text, links ISBNs and math, as well as usual formatting elements and most world alphabets and common symbols. Most of these have simple formats that are deliberately very easy and intuitive.
Wikipedia has robust version and reversion controls. This means that poor quality edits or vandalism can quickly and easily be reversed or brought up to an appropriate standard by any other editors, so inexperienced editors cannot accidentally do permanent harm if they make a mistake in their editing. As there are many more editors intent upon good quality articles than any other kind, articles that are poorly edited are usually corrected rapidly.
Wikipedia content criteriaEdit
Wikipedia content is intended to be factual, notable, verifiable with external sources, and neutrally presented, with external sources cited.
The appropriate policies and guidelines for these are found at:
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not summarizes what Wikipedia is, and what it is not.
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view Wikipedia's core approach, neutral unbiased article writing.
- Wikipedia:No original research what is, and is not, valid information
- Wikipedia:Verifiability what counts as a verifiable source and how a source can be verified
- Wikipedia:Citing sources sources should be cited, and the manner of doing so.
Handling disputes and abuse of processEdit
- Main articles: Wikipedia:Vandalism, Wikipedia:Dispute resolution, Wikipedia:Consensus, Wikipedia:Sock puppet
Wikipedia has a rich span of methods to handle most abuses which commonly arise, which are well tested and should be relied upon.
- Intentional vandalism can be reported and corrected by anyone.
- Unresolved disputes between editors, whether based upon behavior, editorial approach or validity of content, can be addressed through the talk page of an article, through requesting comments from other editors or through Wikipedia's comprehensive dispute resolution process.
- Abuse of user accounts, such as the creation of Internet sock puppets or solicitation of friends and other parties to enforce a non-neutral viewpoint or inappropriate consensus within a discussion, or to disrupt other Wikipedia processes in an annoying manner, are addressed through the sock puppet policy.
In addition, brand new users (until they have established themselves a bit) may at the start find that their votes are given less weight by editors in some informal polls, in order to prevent abuse of single purpose accounts.
Wikipedia was founded as an offshoot of Nupedia, a now-abandoned project to produce a free encyclopedia. Nupedia had an elaborate system of peer review and required highly qualified contributors, but the writing of articles was seen as very slow. During 2000, Jimmy Wales, founder of Nupedia, and Larry Sanger, whom Wales had employed to work on the project, discussed various ways to supplement Nupedia with a more open, complementary project.
On the evening of January 2, 2001, Sanger had a conversation over dinner with Ben Kovitz, a computer programmer, in San Diego, California. Kovitz, who was a regular on "Ward's Wiki" (the WikiWikiWeb), explained the wiki concept to Sanger. Sanger saw that a wiki would be an excellent format whereby a more open, less formal encyclopedia project could be pursued. Sanger easily persuaded Wales, who had been introduced to the wiki concept previously, to set up a wiki for Nupedia, and Nupedia's first wiki went online on January 10.
There was considerable resistance on the part of Nupedia's editors and reviewers to the idea of associating Nupedia with a website in the wiki format, however, so the new project was given the name "Wikipedia" and launched on its own domain, wikipedia.com, on January 15 (now humorously called "Wikipedia Day" by some users). The bandwidth and server (located in San Diego) were donated by Wales. Other current and past Bomis employees who have done some work on the encyclopedia include Tim Shell, one of the co-founders of Bomis and its current CEO, and programmer Jason Richey.
In May 2001, the first wave of non-English Wikipedias were launched (in Catalan, Chinese, Dutch, German, Esperanto, French, Hebrew, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, and Swedish, soon joined by Arabic and Hungarian ). In September,  a further commitment to the multilingual provision of Wikipedia was made. At the end of the year, when international statistics first began to be logged, Afrikaans, Norwegian, and Serbocroatian versions were announced.
There are 67,000 active contributors working on over 4,600,000 articles in more than 100 languages. As of today, there are ७२,१३२ articles in English; every day hundreds of thousands of visitors from around the world make tens of thousands of edits and create thousands of new articles to enhance the amount of knowledge held by the Wikipedia encyclopedia. Visitors do not need any special qualifications to contribute, and people of all ages help to write Wikipedia articles.
All the text in Wikipedia, and most of the images and other content, is covered by the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Contributions remain the property of their creators, while the GFDL license ensures the content will remain freely distributable and reproducible (see the copyright notice and the content disclaimer for more information).
The hardware supporting the various projects is based on almost 100 servers hosted in various hosting centers around the world. Full descriptions of the various servers are available on this meta page.
For technical information about Wikipedia, you can check Technical FAQs.
Theories as to why Wikipedia is popularEdit
Various ideas exist as to why Wikipedia has bewitched so many people:
- Wikipedia offers information for almost any subject in a consistent, easy-to-read style.
- Wikipedia is mapping out group-behaviour in a way that's never been done before.
- People derive pleasure and validation from seeing their edits remain in place.
- The real prospect that mass-editing might be less subjective than the conventional editing process.
- The "herding effect" that inexplicably gathers around certain aspects of pop culture.
- The pleasant surprise that goodwill prevails in Wikipedia, suggesting that humans are basically good, and that evil is overcome by cooperation.
- Never before has the boundary between participant and observer been blurred on such a large scale.
- Any fact can be noted in Wikipedia when found and it should then always be there for later reference.
- If a topic is popular, it will be searched for. If it does not exist it is only a matter of time before someone creates it. From that point all other people searching that popular topic will find the article and many will contribute to it. Therefore finding an article based on ones search criteria is highly likely ever more so with time. It also means the most popular topics are also generally the most heavily edited.
- It is regularly updated so that information is relatively fresh as opposed to normal encyclopedic articles which may take months or years to publish.
Feedback and questionsEdit
Wikipedia itself is run as a communal effort. It is a community project whose end result is an encyclopedia. Feedback about content should, in the first instance, be raised on the discussion pages of those articles. You are invited to be bold and edit the pages yourself to add information or correct mistakes if you are knowledgeable and able to do so.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)Edit
- FAQ index: Index of all Wikipedia FAQ pages
There is an established escalation and dispute process within Wikipedia, as well as pages designed for raising questions, feedback, suggestions and comments:
- Talk pages - the associated discussion page for discussion of an article or policy's contents. This is usually the first place to go.
- Wikipedia:Vandalism - to report vandalism (you're encouraged to fix vandalism yourself as well as report it)
- Dispute resolution - for disputes which remain unresolved within an article's talk space.
- Village pump - the Wikipedia discussion area, part of the community portal.
- Bug tracker, for reporting issues with the Wikipedia web site or the MediaWiki software that runs it
- Village pump: proposals page for non-policy suggestions
- Wikipedia:Help desk - Wikipedia's general help desk, if other pages haven't answered your query.
Research help and similar questionsEdit
Facilities for help for users researching specific topics can be found at:
- Wikipedia:Requested articles - to suggest or request articles for future.
- Wikipedia:Reference desk - help finding specific facts.
Because of the nature of Wikipedia, it's encouraged that people looking for information should try and find it themselves in the first instance. If however you come across valid information missing from Wikipedia, be bold and add it yourself so others can gain from your research too!
For specific discussion not related to article content or editor conduct, see the Village pump, which covers such subjects as news and announcements, policy and technical discussion, and information on other specialized portals such as the help, reference and peer review desks.
For other user discussion of Wikipedia in general, see Wikipedia:Community Portal.whiplash
Contacting individual Wikipedia editorsEdit
If you need more information, the first place to go is the Help:Contents. To contact individual contributors, leave a message on their talk page. Standard places to ask policy and project-related questions are the village pump, online, and the Wikipedia mailing lists, over e-mail. You can also reach other Wikipedians via IRC and instant messenger.
There is also a meta-Wikipedia, a site for coordinating the various Wikipedia projects (and abstract discussions of policy and direction), and there are many different places for submitting bug reports and feature requests.
For a full list of contact options, see: Wikipedia:Contact us.
सम्बन्धित भाय् व ज्याखंEdit
थ्व जाथाय् विकिपिडियाया नेपालभाषाय् च्वया तःगु संस्करण ख। नेपालभाषाया विकिपिडिया इन्क्युबेटरय् परिक्षणया रुपय् जुन ४, सन् २००६ निसें सञ्चालन जुल धाःसा आधिकारिक रुपय् अक्टोबर १, सन् २००६य् पलिस्था जुल। नेपालभाषाया विकिपिडियाय् आ तक्क ७२,१३२ च्वसुइ ज्या जुयाच्वँगु दु। मेमेगु हलिमसफूइ दक्ले तधंगु हलिमसफू क्वे बिया तगु दु:
फुकी (जःला: खःला:) ज्याझ्व:Edit
- What is it with Wikipedia? 16 December 2005